Warning: Undefined variable $HTTP_USER_AGENT in /var/www/vhosts/basil/kbsite/blog/wp-content/themes/redesign/image_switcher.php on line 3
Kevin Basil

“The more I study the history of the Orthodox Church in this country, the more I am convinced that our work here is God's work; that God himself is helping us; that when it seems as though everything we do is ready to fail, …on the contrary, it not only does not die, but grows in new strength and brilliance.” [said just before leaving the United States for Russia]
Saint Tikhon, enlightener of America

«— My Dream
—» Dousing Flames

A Valid Argument

Link to this post  


Warning: Undefined property: linknotes::$are_links in /var/www/vhosts/basil/kbsite/blog/wp-content/plugins/linknotes.php on line 73
Share with your friends and followers:
Share

There seem to be some people out there that believe that the validator provided by the W3C can test for the validity of structural markup. The rationality of this argument eludes me. The validator can only test to be sure that a document’s markup is “well-formed,” i.e., that tags are properly closed, the appropriate HTML entities are used, and that tag attributes actually exist in the version of (X)HTML specified by the DOCTYPE. It has no way of determining whether the author is using the correct tags for the document’s content. Thus, it is entirely possible for a document to be valid in terms of “well-formed (X)HTML,” and yet be invalid in terms of document structure. A script cannot determine what tags are appropriate structural markup for a document. As an example, I hacked up a dummy document to illustrate my point. I hope you have a good laugh.

As web content authors, we have to rise above the level of computers when choosing our tags.

Share with your friends and followers:
Share
Share

Filed under: — Basil @ 8:56 am